CVE-2025-62164
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A vulnerability in vLLM allows attackers to supply malicious serialized prompt-embedding tensors that are deserialized using torch.load() without validation. Due to PyTorch 2.8.0 disabling sparse-tensor integrity checks by default, a crafted tensor can bypass bounds checks and cause an out-of-bounds write during to_dense(), leading to a crash (DoS) and potentially remote code execution on the vLLM server.
Statement
This vulnerability is considered important rather than moderate because it involves unsafe deserialization leading to memory corruption in a network-reachable, unauthenticated API path. Unlike typical moderate flaws that may only allow limited DoS or require specific conditions, this issue allows an attacker to supply a crafted sparse tensor that triggers an out-of-bounds memory write during PyTorch’s to_dense() conversion. Memory corruption in a server process handling untrusted input significantly elevates security risk because it can lead not only to a reliable crash but also to potential remote code execution, enabling full compromise of the vLLM service. Additionally, the affected code path is part of the standard Completions API workflow, making the attack surface broadly exposed in real deployments. The combination of remote exploitability, unauthenticated access, memory corruption, and potential RCE clearly positions this issue above a moderate classification and into an important severity level.
Mitigation
No mitigation is currently available that meets Red Hat Product Security’s standards for usability, deployment, applicability, or stability.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2416282: vllm: VLLM deserialization vulnerability leading to DoS and potential RCE
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2025-62164
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62164
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-62164
Content from github.com is not included.https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/27204
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat AI Inference Server | rhaiis/vllm-spyre-rhel9 | Affected | |
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2 | rhaiis/vllm-cuda-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2025:23204 |
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2 | rhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2025:23205 |
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2 | rhaiis/vllm-tpu-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2025:23209 |
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2 | rhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2025:23449 |
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2 | rhaiis/vllm-cuda-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:3461 |
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2 | rhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:3462 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) | rhelai1/bootc-amd-rhel9 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) | rhelai1/bootc-aws-nvidia-rhel9 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) | rhelai1/bootc-azure-amd-rhel9 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) | rhelai1/bootc-azure-nvidia-rhel9 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) | rhelai1/bootc-gcp-nvidia-rhel9 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) | rhelai1/bootc-intel-rhel9 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) | rhelai1/bootc-nvidia-rhel9 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) | rhelai1/instructlab-amd-rhel9 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) | rhelai1/instructlab-intel-rhel9 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) | rhelai1/instructlab-nvidia-rhel9 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3 | rhelai3/bootc-aws-cuda-rhel9 | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3 | rhelai3/bootc-azure-cuda-rhel9 | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3 | rhelai3/bootc-cuda-rhel9 | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3 | rhelai3/bootc-gcp-cuda-rhel9 | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI) | rhoai/odh-vllm-cuda-rhel9 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI) | rhoai/odh-vllm-rocm-rhel9 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25 | rhoai/odh-kserve-agent-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2025:23531 |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25 | rhoai/odh-kserve-controller-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2025:23531 |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25 | rhoai/odh-kserve-router-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2025:23531 |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25 | rhoai/odh-kserve-storage-initializer-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2025:23531 |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3 | rhoai/odh-vllm-cpu-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:19712 |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3 | rhoai/odh-vllm-gaudi-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:3713 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 8.8 | |
| Attack Vector | Network | |
| Attack Complexity | Low | |
| Privileges Required | Low | |
| User Interaction | None | |
| Scope | Unchanged | |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | |
| Integrity Impact | High | |
| Availability Impact | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.