CVE-2025-62372
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A denial-of-service vulnerability in vLLM allows an attacker with API access to crash the engine by submitting multimodal embedding tensors that have the correct number of dimensions but an invalid internal shape. Because vLLM validates only the tensor’s ndim and not the full expected shape, malformed embeddings trigger shape mismatches or validation failures during processing, causing the inference engine to terminate.
Statement
This flaw is rated Moderate rather than Important because its impact is strictly limited to availability and requires low but existing privileges to exploit. The issue arises from incomplete shape validation of multimodal embedding tensors, which can cause deterministic crashes in the inference engine, but it does not enable memory corruption, data leakage, integrity compromise, or execution of arbitrary code. Exploitation requires an authenticated or API-key-holding user to submit malformed multimodal inputs, meaning it cannot be triggered by an unauthenticated attacker on an exposed endpoint. Additionally, the failure mode is a clean crash rather than undefined behavior, so the blast radius is constrained to service interruption rather than broader systemic compromise. These factors—PR:L requirement, no confidentiality/integrity impact, deterministic failure mode, and scoped DoS only—technically align the issue with Moderate severity instead of an Important flaw.
Mitigation
No mitigation is currently available that meets Red Hat Product Security’s standards for usability, deployment, applicability, or stability.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2416280: vllm: vLLM vulnerable to DoS with incorrect shape of multimodal embedding inputs
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-129: Improper Validation of Array Index
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2025-62372
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62372
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-62372
Content from github.com is not included.https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/27204
Content from github.com is not included.https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/6613
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat AI Inference Server | rhaiis/vllm-spyre-rhel9 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2 | rhaiis/vllm-cuda-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2025:23204 |
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2 | rhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2025:23205 |
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2 | rhaiis/vllm-tpu-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2025:23209 |
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2 | rhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2025:23449 |
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2 | rhaiis/vllm-cuda-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:3461 |
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2 | rhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:3462 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) | rhelai1/bootc-amd-rhel9 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) | rhelai1/bootc-aws-nvidia-rhel9 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) | rhelai1/bootc-azure-amd-rhel9 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) | rhelai1/bootc-azure-nvidia-rhel9 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) | rhelai1/bootc-gcp-nvidia-rhel9 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) | rhelai1/bootc-intel-rhel9 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) | rhelai1/bootc-nvidia-rhel9 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) | rhelai1/instructlab-amd-rhel9 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) | rhelai1/instructlab-intel-rhel9 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) | rhelai1/instructlab-nvidia-rhel9 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3 | rhelai3/bootc-aws-cuda-rhel9 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3 | rhelai3/bootc-azure-cuda-rhel9 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3 | rhelai3/bootc-cuda-rhel9 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3 | rhelai3/bootc-gcp-cuda-rhel9 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI) | rhoai/odh-kserve-agent-rhel9 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI) | rhoai/odh-kserve-controller-rhel9 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI) | rhoai/odh-kserve-router-rhel9 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI) | rhoai/odh-kserve-storage-initializer-rhel9 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI) | rhoai/odh-vllm-cpu-rhel9 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI) | rhoai/odh-vllm-cuda-rhel9 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI) | rhoai/odh-vllm-gaudi-rhel9 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI) | rhoai/odh-vllm-rocm-rhel9 | Fix deferred |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | Low | Low |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | None |
| Integrity Impact | None | None |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.