CVE-2025-7424
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in the libxslt library. The same memory field, psvi, is used for both stylesheet and input data, which can lead to type confusion during XML transformations. This vulnerability allows an attacker to crash the application or corrupt memory. In some cases, it may lead to denial of service or unexpected behavior.
Statement
This type confusion vulnerability in libxslt has been rated as Important due to its potential to corrupt memory and crash applications during XML transformations. The flaw stems from unsafe reuse of the psvi field between stylesheet and input nodes, causing the program to misinterpret internal data types. When malicious XSLT stylesheets are processed, this confusion can lead to memory corruption or denial-of-service. Given libxslt’s widespread use in web browsers, server-side applications, and XML processing pipelines, the impact of this vulnerability can extend to user-facing services and backend systems alike.
Mitigation
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2379228: libxslt: Type confusion in xmlNode.psvi between stylesheet and source nodes
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-843: Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2025-7424
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7424
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-7424
Content from gitlab.gnome.org is not included.https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxslt/-/issues/139
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | libxml2 | Fixed | RHBA-2025:12345 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | libxslt | Fixed | RHBA-2025:12345 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | libxslt | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | libxslt | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | libxslt | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | libxslt | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Hardened Images | libxslt-main | Fixed | RHSA-2026:11015 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | rhcos | Not affected |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | None |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | None |
| Integrity Impact | None | None |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Acknowledgements
Red Hat would like to thank Ivan Fratric (Google Project Zero) for reporting this issue.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.