CVE-2026-10840
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in the OpenShift Pipelines operator. The tekton-scheduler-rolebinding ClusterRoleBinding grants the system:authenticated group write access to Kueue and cert-manager custom resources via the tekton-scheduler-role ClusterRole. When Kueue or cert-manager CRDs are present on the cluster, any authenticated user can disrupt workload scheduling, tamper with scheduling priorities, delete other tenants' Workload objects, or induce cert-manager to overwrite TLS Secrets including the default ingress controller certificate.
Statement
This is an Important flaw in the OpenShift Pipelines operator where the tekton-scheduler-rolebinding grants system:authenticated users cluster-wide write access to Kueue and cert-manager resources. This allows any authenticated user to disrupt workload scheduling, manipulate priorities, delete Workload objects, or may overwrite TLS Secrets, such as the default ingress controller certificate, by leveraging cert-manager's privileges. The vulnerable RBAC objects are deployed regardless of whether the Tekton Scheduler feature is enabled.
Mitigation
If the Tekton Scheduler feature is not in use, administrators can mitigate this by patching the ClusterRoleBinding to reference a specific ServiceAccount instead of system:authenticated:
oc patch clusterrolebinding tekton-scheduler-rolebinding --type=merge -p '{"subjects": [{"kind": "ServiceAccount", "name": "openshift-pipelines-operator", "namespace": "openshift-operators"}]}'
IMPORTANT: The OpenShift Pipelines operator's reconciliation loop may revert this manual patch. Verify that the operator does not reconcile this binding back to system:authenticated after applying the mitigation. If it does, scale down the operator deployment or configure the operator to skip reconciliation of this object.
Alternatively, the ClusterRoleBinding can be deleted if the Tekton Scheduler is not enabled.
Additional information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2484720: openshift-pipelines-operator-rh: openshift-pipelines-operator: tekton-scheduler-rolebinding grants system:authenticated write access to Kueue and cert-manager resources
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-732: Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenShift Pipelines | openshift-pipelines/pipelines-operator-proxy-rhel9 | Affected | |
| OpenShift Pipelines | openshift-pipelines/pipelines-operator-webhook-rhel8 | Affected | |
| OpenShift Pipelines | openshift-pipelines/pipelines-operator-webhook-rhel9 | Affected | |
| OpenShift Pipelines | openshift-pipelines/pipelines-rhel9-operator | Affected | |
| OpenShift Pipelines | openshift-pipelines/pipelines-operator-proxy-rhel8 | Not affected | |
| OpenShift Pipelines | openshift-pipelines/pipelines-rhel8-operator | Not affected | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Builds 1.7.4 | openshift-builds/openshift-builds-rhel9-operator | Fixed | RHSA-2026:36648 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Builds 1.8.1 | openshift-builds/openshift-builds-rhel9-operator | Fixed | RHSA-2026:41036 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.1 | N/A | 7.1 |
| Attack Vector | Network | N/A | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | N/A | Low |
| Privileges Required | Low | N/A | Low |
| User Interaction | None | N/A | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | N/A | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | N/A | None |
| Integrity Impact | Low | N/A | Low |
| Availability Impact | High | N/A | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
cve.org CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
Acknowledgements
Red Hat would like to thank Christopher Lusk (North Echo Security Research) for reporting this issue.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.