CVE-2026-11856
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in curl. When libcurl performs a transfer to an HTTP origin using Digest authentication and then reuses the same connection handle for a subsequent transfer to a different origin, it may incorrectly send the authentication header intended for the first origin to the second. This could lead to unintended information disclosure, potentially allowing an attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive data.
Statement
This Moderate-severity flaw in libcurl can lead to information disclosure when an application reuses a libcurl handle for transfers to different HTTP origins while using Digest authentication. The vulnerability arises from libcurl incorrectly sending the authentication header intended for the initial origin to a subsequent, different origin. This could expose sensitive authentication data to an unintended recipient, potentially compromising user credentials or session information. The only observed impact from this flaw is an integrity impact.
- libcurl only — the curl CLI is not affected
- Requires an application to reuse an easy handle across different HTTP origins while Digest auth state is attached — a specific programming pattern
- Credentials themselves are not leaked; only the authenticated state ("Authorization: ..." HTTP header)
- Fixed in curl 8.21.0; affected range: 7.10.6 – 8.20.0
Mitigation
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.
Correct usage of the library: Create a fresh handle for a different origin, or explicitly clear authentication-related state before reuse:
c
// req.A
curl = curl_easy_init();
...
curl_easy_cleanup(curl);
// req.B
curl = curl_easy_init();
...
curl_easy_cleanup(curl);
Fixed in libcurl 8.21.0; affected range: 7.10.6 – 8.20.0
Additional information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2496767: curl: curl: Information disclosure via incorrect Digest authentication header reuse
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-201: Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11856
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-11856
Content from curl.se is not included.https://curl.se/docs/CVE-2026-11856.html
Content from curl.se is not included.https://curl.se/docs/CVE-2026-11856.json
Content from hackerone.com is not included.https://hackerone.com/reports/3793260
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | curl | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | curl | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | curl | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | curl | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | curl | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Hardened Images | curl-main | Fixed | RHSA-2026:29017 |
| Red Hat Hardened Images | rust-main | Fixed | RHSA-2026:34975 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | rhcos | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces | devspaces/code-rhel9 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Trusted Profile Analyzer | rhtpa/rhtpa-trustification-service-rhel9 | Not affected |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 6.5 | N/A | 9.8 |
| Attack Vector | Network | N/A | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | N/A | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | N/A | None |
| User Interaction | Required | N/A | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | N/A | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | N/A | High |
| Integrity Impact | None | N/A | High |
| Availability Impact | None | N/A | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cve.org CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Red Hat CVSS v3 Score Explanation
AC:H — exploitation requires application-level libcurl easy handle reuse across different HTTP origins with Digest authentication, a specific programming pattern
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.