CVE-2026-23066
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in the Linux kernel. A local unprivileged process can exploit an unsafe requeue path in the rxrpc_recvmsg function by using AF_RXRPC sockets with MSG_DONTWAIT and MSG_PEEK flags. This improper handling of the receive message queue can lead to memory corruption, such as Use-After-Frees (UAFs) or reference count underruns. The most likely outcome is a kernel crash or memory safety warning, resulting in a denial of service. There is also a conservative possibility of broader impact if the memory corruption is exploitable.
Statement
An unsafe requeue path in rxrpc_recvmsg can corrupt the recvmsg queue because a call is requeued unconditionally even if it is already on the queue due to MSG_PEEK or a concurrent IO thread requeue. This can corrupt the linked list bookkeeping and can manifest as use after free or refcount underrun in RXRPC call objects. The most likely outcome is a kernel crash or memory safety warning which results in denial of service. For the CVSS the PR is N because a local unprivileged process can trigger the behavior by using AF_RXRPC sockets and recvmsg with MSG_DONTWAIT and MSG_PEEK patterns. The issue is not directly network reachable as a pure remote packet trigger because the vulnerable operation is in the local recvmsg path. Remote traffic can influence timing and queue state but a local caller is still needed to exercise the buggy logic. Impact is primarily availability with a conservative possibility of broader impact if the memory corruption is exploitable.
Mitigation
To mitigate this issue, prevent module rxrpc from being loaded. Please see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/41278 for how to blacklist a kernel module to prevent it from loading automatically.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2436805: kernel: Linux kernel: Denial of Service via unsafe requeue in rxrpc_recvmsg
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-416: Use After Free
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2026-23066
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23066
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23066
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | kernel | Affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update Support | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2026:9095 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel-rt | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel-rt | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel | Affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel-rt | Affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Update Services for SAP Solutions | kernel-rt | Fixed | RHSA-2026:9512 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Update Services for SAP Solutions | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2026:9644 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update Support | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2026:10108 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.6 Extended Update Support | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2026:9112 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.4 | 5.5 |
| Attack Vector | Local | Local |
| Attack Complexity | High | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | Low |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | None |
| Integrity Impact | High | None |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.