CVE-2026-44843
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in LangChain, a framework for building agents and large language model (LLM)-powered applications. Older runtime code paths within LangChain deserialize application-controlled payloads using overly broad object allowlists. A remote attacker can exploit this by supplying specially crafted LangChain serialized constructor dictionaries, leading to the instantiation of classes with untrusted arguments. This can result in the disclosure of sensitive information and potential partial compromise of data integrity.
Statement
This Important vulnerability in LangChain allows a remote attacker to achieve information disclosure and partial data integrity compromise. The flaw arises from overly broad object allowlists in older runtime code paths, which can deserialize attacker-controlled payloads and instantiate classes with untrusted arguments. Red Hat products integrating LangChain are affected if they process untrusted structured input and utilize deprecated APIs such as RunnableWithMessageHistory, astream_log(), or astream_events(version="v1"), potentially leading to prompt injection or sensitive data exposure.
Mitigation
To mitigate this issue, applications using LangChain should avoid passing untrusted structured input directly to load() or loads() functions. Instead, ensure all incoming untrusted data is validated and canonicalized into an inert schema before being processed by LangChain. Additionally, migrate away from deprecated LangChain APIs, including RunnableWithMessageHistory, astream_log(), and astream_events(version="v1"), as these older code paths are more susceptible to insecure deserialization.
Additional information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2481695: langchain: LangChain: Information disclosure and data integrity compromise via insecure deserialization
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exploit Intelligence | exploit-intelligence-tech-preview/vulnerability-analysis-rhel9 | Affected | |
| OpenShift Lightspeed | openshift-lightspeed/lightspeed-service-api-rhel9 | Affected | |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2 | ansible-automation-platform-24/lightspeed-rhel8 | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2 | ansible-automation-platform-25/lightspeed-chatbot-rhel8 | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2 | ansible-automation-platform-25/lightspeed-rhel8 | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3 | rhelai3/bootc-cuda-rhel9 | Affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3 | rhelai3/bootc-gaudi-rhel9 | Affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3 | rhelai3/bootc-rocm-rhel9 | Affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3 | rhelai3/disk-image-cuda-rhel9 | Affected | |
| Red Hat Migration Toolkit for Applications 8.2 | mta/mta-solution-server-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:43038 |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI) | rhoai/odh-autorag-rhel9 | Affected | |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI) | rhoai/odh-llama-stack-core-rhel9 | Affected | |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI) | rhoai/odh-trustyai-garak-lls-provider-dsp-rhel9 | Affected | |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI) | rhoai/odh-trustyai-nemo-guardrails-server-rhel9 | Affected |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 8.2 | N/A | 8.2 |
| Attack Vector | Network | N/A | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | N/A | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | N/A | None |
| User Interaction | None | N/A | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | N/A | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | N/A | High |
| Integrity Impact | Low | N/A | Low |
| Availability Impact | None | N/A | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
cve.org CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.