CVE-2026-55955
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in Apache Tomcat. An improper authentication vulnerability in the EncryptionInterceptor component allows a remote attacker to perform a replay attack. This could lead to unauthorized access or manipulation of data within the cluster component.
Statement
A flaw was found in Apache Tomcat's EncryptionInterceptor used for Tribes cluster communication. An improper authentication vulnerability allows a replay attack against encrypted cluster messages. Exploitation requires the EncryptionInterceptor to be configured for Tomcat clustering, which is a non-default configuration, and the attacker must have access to the cluster network to capture and replay messages. Apache rates this vulnerability as Low severity. Red Hat has corrected the impact from IMPORTANT to MODERATE — the original AI-Bot CVSS of 8.2 (AV:N/AC:L) incorrectly scored this as internet-facing with low complexity, when Tribes cluster traffic is adjacent-network (AV:A) and requires non-default clustering configuration (AC:H). The corrected vector is CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N (4.2).
Mitigation
This vulnerability only affects Tomcat deployments using the EncryptionInterceptor for Tribes cluster communication. Deployments that do not use Tomcat clustering or do not configure the EncryptionInterceptor are not affected. Ensure cluster communication channels are restricted to trusted, isolated networks.
Additional information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2494678: tomcat: Apache Tomcat: Replay attack via improper authentication in EncryptionInterceptor
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-294: Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay
External References
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | tomcat | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | tomcat9 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | tomcat6 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | tomcat | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | pki-deps:10.6/pki-servlet-engine | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | tomcat | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | pki-servlet-engine | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | tomcat | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Hardened Images | tomcat10-main | Fixed | RHSA-2026:29203 |
| Red Hat Hardened Images | tomcat11-main | Fixed | RHSA-2026:32960 |
| Red Hat JBoss Web Server 5 | jws5-tomcat | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat JBoss Web Server 6 | tomcat-catalina | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss Web Server 7 | tomcat-catalina | Not affected |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 4.2 | N/A | 6.5 |
| Attack Vector | Adjacent Network | N/A | Network |
| Attack Complexity | High | N/A | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | N/A | None |
| User Interaction | None | N/A | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | N/A | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | Low | N/A | Low |
| Integrity Impact | Low | N/A | Low |
| Availability Impact | None | N/A | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
cve.org CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.