CVE-2026-7500
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
When Keycloak is started with --features-disabled=account,account-api, the Account REST API is only partially disabled. Five endpoints under the versioned path /account/v1alpha1 remain fully functional — including both read and write operations — because they lack the checkAccountApiEnabled() gate that correctly blocks four other endpoints in the same REST service class. The user needs to have permissions to use the API.
Statement
This Moderate impact flaw in Keycloak allows authenticated users to bypass the intended disablement of the account and account-api features when Keycloak is started with --features-disabled=account,account-api. This bypass enables unauthorized read and write operations on specific account endpoints, despite the configuration aiming to restrict such access.
Mitigation
To reduce the attack surface, restrict network access to the Keycloak server's administration and API endpoints to trusted networks or hosts. This limits the ability of unauthorized users to interact with the server and potentially exploit this improper access control vulnerability. If the Keycloak service is reloaded or restarted, ensure that firewall rules or network access controls remain in effect.
Additional information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2464126: org.keycloak.keycloak-services: Improper Access Control on Keycloak Server when the account Account API feature is disabled
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-425: Direct Request ('Forced Browsing')
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 | rhbk/keycloak-operator-bundle | Fixed | RHSA-2026:30050 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:30050 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator | Fixed | RHSA-2026:30050 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.13 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:30049 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 | rhbk/keycloak-operator-bundle | Fixed | RHSA-2026:25097 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:25097 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator | Fixed | RHSA-2026:25097 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.3 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:25098 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 5.4 | N/A | N/A |
| Attack Vector | Network | N/A | N/A |
| Attack Complexity | Low | N/A | N/A |
| Privileges Required | Low | N/A | N/A |
| User Interaction | None | N/A | N/A |
| Scope | Unchanged | N/A | N/A |
| Confidentiality Impact | Low | N/A | N/A |
| Integrity Impact | Low | N/A | N/A |
| Availability Impact | None | N/A | N/A |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Acknowledgements
Red Hat would like to thank Evan Hendra for reporting this issue.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.