CVE-2026-7571
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in Keycloak. A low-privilege user, with knowledge of user credentials and client ID, can bypass a security control intended to disable the implicit flow in OpenID Connect (OIDC) clients. By manipulating client data during a session restart, an attacker can obtain an access token that should not be available. This vulnerability can also lead to the exposure of these access tokens in server logs, proxy logs, and HTTP Referrer headers, resulting in sensitive information disclosure.
Statement
This High severity flaw in Keycloak allows a low-privilege user, with knowledge of user credentials and client ID, to bypass the implicitFlowEnabled=false setting. By forging client data during a session restart, an attacker can obtain an implicit access token, potentially exposing it in URL query strings if response_mode=query is also forged. This bypass undermines a critical security control intended to prevent implicit flow, leading to unauthorized access to sensitive tokens.
Mitigation
To mitigate this issue, restrict network access to the Keycloak authentication endpoint to trusted clients and networks. Implement firewall rules to control inbound connections to the Keycloak service ports, thereby reducing the attack surface and limiting who can initiate authentication flows and potentially exploit the implicit flow bypass. If the Keycloak service is reloaded or restarted, ensure these network restrictions remain in effect.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2464263: keycloak: Keycloak: Access token disclosure and implicit flow bypass via forged client data
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-472: External Control of Assumed-Immutable Web Parameter
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2026-7571
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-7571
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-7571
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 | rhbk/keycloak-operator-bundle | Fixed | RHSA-2026:19597 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:19597 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator | Fixed | RHSA-2026:19597 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.12 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator | Fixed | RHSA-2026:19596 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.1 | |
| Attack Vector | Network | |
| Attack Complexity | Low | |
| Privileges Required | Low | |
| User Interaction | None | |
| Scope | Unchanged | |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | |
| Integrity Impact | Low | |
| Availability Impact | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Acknowledgements
Red Hat would like to thank Evan Hendra for reporting this issue.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.