CVE-2026-9792

Public on

Last Modified: UTC

Moderate Moderate severity What does this mean?
6.5 CVSS v3 Score Breakdown

Description

A flaw was found in Keycloak's Client Policies, specifically within the org.keycloak.protocol.oidc component. When certain condition providers (client-type, client-roles, client-attributes, client-scopes) are used to enforce security restrictions, the reject-ropc-grant executor is silently bypassed. This allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to obtain tokens via a Resource Owner Password Credentials (ROPC) grant, even when a policy is explicitly configured to block it. This bypass can lead to unauthorized access and information disclosure.

Statement

This Medium severity flaw in Keycloak allows client policies designed to reject Resource Owner Password Credentials (ROPC) grants to be bypassed. When specific condition providers (client-type, client-roles, client-attributes, or client-scopes) are used, clients can obtain tokens via ROPC despite explicit policy configuration to block such requests. This impacts Keycloak deployments where administrators rely on these policies to enforce FAPI 2.0 compliance and prevent credential exposure.

Mitigation

To mitigate this issue, Keycloak administrators should review and adjust client policies designed to reject Resource Owner Password Credentials (ROPC) grants. Avoid using the `client-type`, `client-roles`, `client-attributes`, or `client-scopes` condition providers in conjunction with the `reject-ropc-grant` executor. Instead, configure policies to use the `grant-type` condition provider for ROPC rejection. A restart or reload of the Keycloak service may be required for these policy changes to take full effect.

Additional information

External References

Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata

Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.

Products / Services Components State Errata
Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 rhbk/keycloak-operator-bundle Fixed RHSA-2026:30050
Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 rhbk/keycloak-rhel9 Fixed RHSA-2026:30050
Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator Fixed RHSA-2026:30050
Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.13 rhbk/keycloak-rhel9 Fixed RHSA-2026:30049
Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 rhbk/keycloak-operator-bundle Fixed RHSA-2026:25097
Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 rhbk/keycloak-rhel9 Fixed RHSA-2026:25097
Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator Fixed RHSA-2026:25097
Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.3 rhbk/keycloak-rhel9 Fixed RHSA-2026:25098

Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details

Important note

CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).

CVSS v3 Score Breakdown

Red Hat NVD cve.org
CVSS v3 Base Score 6.5 N/A N/A
Attack Vector Network N/A N/A
Attack Complexity Low N/A N/A
Privileges Required None N/A N/A
User Interaction None N/A N/A
Scope Unchanged N/A N/A
Confidentiality Impact Low N/A N/A
Integrity Impact Low N/A N/A
Availability Impact None N/A N/A

CVSS v3 Vector

Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Acknowledgements

Red Hat would like to thank Evan Hendra (Independent Security Researcher) for reporting this issue.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?

 For open source software shipped by multiple vendors, the CVSS base scores may vary for each vendor's version depending on the version they ship, how they ship it, the platform, and even how the software is compiled. This makes scoring of vulnerabilities difficult for third-party vulnerability databases such as NVD that only provide a single CVSS base score for each vulnerability. Red Hat scores reflect how a vulnerability affects our products specifically.

For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.

My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
  • "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
  • "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.

What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?

 A "will not fix" status means that a fix for an affected product version is not planned or not possible due to complexity, which may create additional risk.

Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
  • Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
  • Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
  • Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.

What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?

 A deferred status means that a fix for an affected product version is not guaranteed due to higher-priority development work.

Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
  • Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
  • Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
  • Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.

What is a mitigation?

 A mitigation is an action that can be taken to reduce the impact of a security vulnerability, without deploying any fixes.

I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?

 The listed products were found to include one or more of the components that this vulnerability affects. These products underwent a thorough evaluation to determine their affectedness by this vulnerability. Note that layered products (such as container-based offerings) that consume affected components from any of the products listed in this table may be affected and are not represented.

Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?

 In order to maintain code stability and compatibility, Red Hat usually does not rebase packages to entirely new versions. Instead, we backport fixes and new features to an older version of the package we distribute. This can result in some security scanners that only consider the package version to report the package as vulnerable. To avoid this, we suggest that you use an approved vulnerability scanner from our This content is not included.Red Hat Vulnerability Scanner Certification program.

My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?

 When a product is listed as "Out of Support Scope", it means a vulnerability with the impact level assigned to this CVE is no longer covered by its current support lifecycle phase. The product has been identified to contain the impacted component, but analysis to determine whether it is affected or not by this vulnerability was not performed. The product should be assumed to be affected. Customers are advised to apply any mitigation options documented on this page, consider removing or disabling the impacted component, or upgrade to a supported version of the product that has an update available.